Technology Reports of Kansai University (ISSN: 04532198) is a monthly peer-reviewed and open-access international Journal. It was first built in 1959 and officially in 1975 till now by kansai university, japan. The journal covers all sort of engineering topic, mathematics and physics. Technology Reports of Kansai University (TRKU) was closed access journal until 2017. After that TRKU became open access journal. TRKU is a scopus indexed journal and directly run by faculty of engineering, kansai university.
Technology Reports of Kansai University (ISSN: 04532198) is a peer-reviewed journal. The journal covers all sort of engineering topic as well as mathematics and physics. the journal's scopes are
in the following fields but not limited to:
Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery
Interventional Pulmonology (middletown, de.)
Using the CR-39 detector the fission-track registration technique was employed for determination of the uranium (U) concentration for 10 tooth samples found at Karbala city in Iraq. Each sample was 1.5 mm thick and 0.5 g in weight. Measurement of the uranium concentration in the samples was made by employing the CR-39 track detector to follow fission tracks caused by bombarding uranium with thermal neutrons from the 241Am-Be source that has a flux of 5 ×103 n cm-2 s-1. Calculations of the concentration levels were made through comparison with standard samples. The outcomes demonstrated that the minimum uranium value is 0.038 ppm and the maximum uranium value is 0.078 ppm
In this work, ANSYS WORKBENCH finite element analysis is used to construct and solve the problems related with the surface crack in round bars under combined bending and torsion moments. The solutions of stress intensity factors under combined loading are then compared with the results combined explicitly from the individual loading. Based on the observations, the pattern of all stress intensity factor is symmetrical and there are some discrepancies between both results as maximum as 4% where the combined stress intensity factors obtained directly from finite element analysis is always higher than the stress intensity factors obtained explicitly. However, for the case of area close to the outer surface, the stress intensity factors from both methods are well agreed to each other